The Mapmaker's Children by Sarah McCoy
appealed to my love of historical fiction. I was intrigued to read about the family of
abolitionist John Brown and what happened them after he was hanged in the
mid-1800s. McCoy created a compelling portrait of his Sarah Brown and I felt great
sympathy for her as she navigated life as a feminist and an abolitionist on her
own right. There were some great lines especially this one just after Sarah's
father had been executed for helping slaves be free. It sounds like it could
have applied to current issues: " People are more capable of love and benevolence than they realized. The collective public voice did not always represent the individual heart. Yes, there are terrible men doing terrible deeds to other men. Men in this very town who abused others based on the color of their skin..."
But McCoy decided to create a dual story with a modern day woman
living near Harper's Ferry, West Virginia and that was irritating. The
switching back and forth between the historical drama of Sarah Brown and the
story of Eden Anderson and her family travails just didn't work for me. Yes,
there were many connections between the two plot lines but they still seemed
inadequate and contrived. I enjoyed each story separately for different
reasons, but I didn't like them side by side.
This book was similar in many ways to The Orphan Train by
Christina Baker Klein, which I read for my book club earlier this year. In The
Orphan Train, the plot lines switched back and forth and the book felt like
a middle school audience novel. At least in that book the different stories
come together (albeit predictably) in the end. But I didn't like that book
either. Switching between historical fiction and modern stories has been
overdone and The Mapmaker's Children felt amateurish. I feel guilty
giving a book a negative review, because I appreciate the effort and know I
couldn't do any better. But I feel readers need to know. I received this book
from Blogging for Books for this review.
No comments:
Post a Comment